Tuesday, December 11, 2018

How to Stop Prison Radicalization (Anyone Can Do It!)

Saturday, December 8, 2018

Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam By Peter McLoughlin and Tommy Robinson

You are here: Home / Mohammed's Koran / Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam By Peter McLoughlin and Tommy Robinson The first 100 pages of Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam demonstrate that, prior to 9/11, all the expert opinion in the West said: the Koran is a garbled mess the Koran cannot be understood unless it is in chronological order Jihad meant killing for Islam (not some "inner struggle") Mohammed switched from preaching peace (the early Koran, in Mecca) to preaching thieving, murdering, slave-taking (the later Koran, in Medina) After proving that this is exactly how Islam was understood in the West in the centuries leading up to 9/11, McLoughlin & Robinson then show the lies about "the Religion of Peace", a lie disseminated by Pope Francis, by President Bush and President Obama, by Hilary Clinton, and by British PMs Blair, Cameron, May. This Grand Lie turns the entire understanding of Islam upside down. The Muslims who kill for Islam know that our ruling elite are lying to us about Islam. At the very start of the book two things are asked of the reader: if the reader is a Muslim, then he is asked to put the book down so that understanding his own religion better does not turn him into a killer; any other reader is asked to just turn to the first pages of the Koran presented in the second half of the book; if within 5 minutes s/he is not convinced that Islam is a religion of war obsessed with the subjugation of non-Muslims, then that reader is asked to return to the first half of the book and read that until they are convinced that what is presented in this book was mainstream scholarly opinion in the West before 9/11. One of the ways in which Islam protects itself from non-Muslims is that the normal Koran is encrypted. McLoughlin & Robinson decrypt the Koran. But they know that most people do not want to spend months or years learning the ins and outs of Islam. Most people just want to be left alone to get on with their lives. Yet when terrorism in the name of Islam abounds then we all owe a duty to our relatives, our society and our civilisation to know, without any doubt at all, that our ruling elite are systematically lying to us about Islam, the religion of war and terrorism. McLoughlin & Robinson explain the concept of "abrogation" and prove how fundamental this concept is to Islam. They show that any of the verses which our lying leaders pluck out to claim that Islam is a religion of peace is a vers that has either been garbled by our leaders or is a verse of the Koran that has been cancelled. There is nothing in a chronologically ordered Koran to give people in the West anything other than fear and dread. The ordinary man or woman cannot rely on Muslims to tell us the truth (because to Muslims Islam is the only truth and Islam authorizes Muslims to employ deception, for example as Taqiyya or Kitman). We cannot rely on writers, clergy, journalists or academics - because they are either in hock to Muslim donors, or because they are Leftists who are allied to Islam, or because such people are simply too scared of Muslims killing them if they speak the truth. You don't have to believe McLoughlin and Robinson's claims. The book has 600 references, which link to the work of other acknowledged authorities on Islam (Western scholars, mainstream translators of the Koran, Muslim and ex-Muslim experts). The book shows you what those who went before us in our own society were saying about Islam. For centuries they were warning the West about Islam. And all their warnings have been concealed by the Quisling elite who have sold your descendants into slavery or civil war. It really is that serious. Those shallow ideologues who dismiss Mohammed's Koran because it is not written by Muslims are missing a vital principle: our society doesn't demand that only Nazis explain Mein Kampf, or that only Communists can criticise Marx, Stalin, etc. If there were Christian terrorists whom the Pope would not denounce, then it is the explanations of non-Christians who would be favoured. Our society regards those who are not proponents of an ideology as more credible and more objective critics of an ideology than those who are already indoctrinated by that ideology. As McLoughlin & Robinson show in the first 100 pages of this book, it is precisely this demand that only Muslims can have an opinion on Islam which has allowed Muslims to fool the electorate in countries across the West. If the people of the West had not been deceived by the Quisling ruling elite, every country would have already elected parties who would have kept Islam outside the borders of our nations. There is now a website accompanying the book Mohammed's Koran, containing 100s of five star reviews. The new website is designed to contain searchable copies of the Koran and the Hadiths.

Poll shows huge Democrat bias toward Muslims, against Christians

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/12/poll-shows-huge-democrat-bias-toward-muslims-against-christians The disinformation campaign has been wildly successful: most Democrats take for granted that opposing jihad mass murder and Sharia oppression of women and non-Muslims is “racist” and “Islamophobic.” “Poll Shows Huge Democrat Bias Toward Muslims Over Christians,” by Neil Munro, Breitbart, December 4, 2018: Sixty-eight percent of Democrats say employers should grant a request for prayer space by Muslims — but only 45 percent say employers should grant a similar request by Christian employees, says a survey by Grinnell College. In contrast to the Democrats’ 23-point anti-Christian bias, the November poll showed only a ten point gap in response from conservatives. Thirty percent of Republicans say employers should provide a prayer space for Muslim employees and 40 percent say employers should support a similar service for Christians, according to the Grinnell College poll of roughly 500 people. The same poll showed a three-point pro-Christian skew among Donald Trump’s voters and a huge 20-point pro-Muslim skew among Hillary Clinton voters. The massive bias among Clinton voters towards Muslims is a huge contrast to Trump voters’ more principled approach to religious requests on business. The poll asked, “Suppose a group of devout Christians [or devout Muslims] asked their employer to provide a private place for them to pray together. Even if it is a hardship [on business], do you think the employer should or should not accommodate the request?” The Democrats’ pro-Muslim bias exists despite the hostility of orthodox Islamic rule-books towards Christians, https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/myths/tolerance.aspx women, secularists, and democracy The poll also showed that urbanites, young people, and women were far more supportive of Muslim believers than of Christians, despite Christianity’s orthodox support for , sexual equality, and economic redistribution….

Thursday, December 6, 2018

The love of Gins

Top Priority in America

Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam

http://www.pmclauth.com/muhammads-quran/summary-muhammads-quran Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam By Peter McLoughlin and Tommy Robinson The first 100 pages of Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill For Islam demonstrate that, prior to 9/11, all the expert opinion in the West said: the Koran is a garbled mess the Koran cannot be understood unless it is in chronological order Jihad meant killing for Islam (not some "inner struggle") Mohammed switched from preaching peace (the early Koran, in Mecca) to preaching thieving, murdering, slave-taking (the later Koran, in Medina) After proving that this is exactly how Islam was understood in the West in the centuries leading up to 9/11, McLoughlin & Robinson then show the lies about "the Religion of Peace", a lie disseminated by Pope Francis, by President Bush and President Obama, by Hilary Clinton, and by British PMs Blair, Cameron, May. This Grand Lie turns the entire understanding of Islam upside down. The Muslims who kill for Islam know that our ruling elite are lying to us about Islam. At the very start of the book two things are asked of the reader: if the reader is a Muslim, then he is asked to put the book down so that understanding his own religion better does not turn him into a killer; any other reader is asked to just turn to the first pages of the Koran presented in the second half of the book; if within 5 minutes s/he is not convinced that Islam is a religion of war obsessed with the subjugation of non-Muslims, then that reader is asked to return to the first half of the book and read that until they are convinced that what is presented in this book was mainstream scholarly opinion in the West before 9/11. One of the ways in which Islam protects itself from non-Muslims is that the normal Koran is encrypted. McLoughlin & Robinson decrypt the Koran. But they know that most people do not want to spend months or years learning the ins and outs of Islam. Most people just want to be left alone to get on with their lives. Yet when terrorism in the name of Islam abounds then we all owe a duty to our relatives, our society and our civilisation to know, without any doubt at all, that our ruling elite are systematically lying to us about Islam, the religion of war and terrorism. McLoughlin & Robinson explain the concept of "abrogation" and prove how fundamental this concept is to Islam. They show that any of the verses which our lying leaders pluck out to claim that Islam is a religion of peace is a vers that has either been garbled by our leaders or is a verse of the Koran that has been cancelled. There is nothing in a chronologically ordered Koran to give people in the West anything other than fear and dread. The ordinary man or woman cannot rely on Muslims to tell us the truth (because to Muslims Islam is the only truth and Islam authorizes Muslims to employ deception, for example as Taqiyya or Kitman). We cannot rely on writers, clergy, journalists or academics - because they are either in hock to Muslim donors, or because they are Leftists who are allied to Islam, or because such people are simply too scared of Muslims killing them if they speak the truth. You don't have to believe McLoughlin and Robinson's claims. The book has 600 references, which link to the work of other acknowledged authorities on Islam (Western scholars, mainstream translators of the Koran, Muslim and ex-Muslim experts). The book shows you what those who went before us in our own society were saying about Islam. For centuries they were warning the West about Islam. And all their warnings have been concealed by the Quisling elite who have sold your descendants into slavery or civil war. It really is that serious. Those shallow ideologues who dismiss Mohammed's Koran because it is not written by Muslims are missing a vital principle: our society doesn't demand that only Nazis explain Mein Kampf, or that only Communists can criticise Marx, Stalin, etc. If there were Christian terrorists whom the Pope would not denounce, then it is the explanations of non-Christians who would be favoured. Our society regards those who are not proponents of an ideology as more credible and more objective critics of an ideology than those who are already indoctrinated by that ideology. As McLoughlin & Robinson show in the first 100 pages of this book, it is precisely this demand that only Muslims can have an opinion on Islam which has allowed Muslims to fool the electorate in countries across the West. If the people of the West had not been deceived by the Quisling ruling elite, every country would have already elected parties who would have kept Islam outside the borders of our nations. There is now a website accompanying the book Mohammed's Koran, containing 100s of five star reviews. The new website is designed to contain searchable copies of the Koran and the Hadiths.

Bill Warner, PhD The Impact of Islam on Christianity

Bill Warner and Gavin Boby on how to stop mosques

4. Jay Smith: Muhammad A Historical Critique

Bill Warner - A Taste of Islam

The Islamic Doctrine of Migration

An Education on Political Islam with Bill Warner: The Crusades and Jihad

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Bill Warner PhD: Migration as Jihad

It's All About Muhammad: A Biography of the World's Most Notorious Prophet

Why all the car bombs, beheadings, and mass murders in the Middle East? Why the relentless killing of non-Muslims throughout the world by the followers of Muhammad's religion? Why Boston, Paris, San Bernardino, Brussels, Orlando, and, Nice, and now . . . ? Author F. W. Burleigh draws on an academic, investigative, and literary background to bring forth this penetrating look at what is behind it all. Burleigh’s interest in Islam was sparked by the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11. The question guiding his studies was, “Why is there so much violence connected with this religion?” After a line-by-line scrutiny of 20,000 pages of the original literature of Islam, the author gives his blunt assessment in the title: It’s All About Muhammad. The book contains 25 stunningly bold illustrations and is divided into three parts: The Cave, The Twilight Zone, and Darkness at Noon. The first 12 chapters explore evidence that Muhammad experienced epileptic fits that convinced him he was in communion with God. They explain the Koran and why Muhammad composed it the way he did. They show the humble origin of the Kabah, which only attained its cubic shape in the year A.D. 605 with Muhammad as a member of the construction crew. These first chapters also expose the magma chamber of hatred that formed in him due to traumatic early-life experiences, and they track the emergence of what can be described as a psychopathic nature. His belief in himself as the "last and final messenger" led him finally to declare war on all people who refused to accept him and his religion. In the second part, Muhammad's magma erupts on the world. The book shows the creation of his al-qaeda--his base of operations in Yathrib (Medina) where he fled after the Meccans decided they had to kill him; his conflict with the Jewish tribes of Yathrib after they refused to accept him as their prophet; his genocide of the Jews including the beheading of the men of an entire tribe; the assassination of his critics; the battles and raids and orgies of rape, plunder, and slaughter; and finally his conquest of Mecca. Like a dramatic arc, these 18 chapters form Act II of a script that is still being played out today. In the final part, Muhammad's conquest of all of Arabia is presented. This section also gives an account of his numerous wives and the expansion of his wars beyond the confines of the Arabian Peninsula. One of the final chapters explores his claim that he will be the first to be resurrected on the day of resurrection and that he will assist God in determining who goes to heaven. What Muhammad created continues to wreak havoc on the world, and that is because Muslims are obligated to follow the example of Muhammad—his sunna, which is where the Sunnis take their name. And his sunna includes the example of the violence he committed against people who rejected him. It is not sufficient any longer merely to raise the alarm about Islam--an ideology of submission to the will of a psychologically deformed and spiritually bankrupt man. What needs to accompany the alarm is a solution, and this book offers a solution: It is a matter of an aggressive, relentless, and unapologetic exposure of the truth about Muhammad in every graphic form possible, from illustrated books to docudramas to full-length feature films. With its 25 illustrations, It's All About Muhammad offers itself as an example of the approach. The truth about Muhammad is a powerful weapon of self-defense that people must take up to oppose and ultimately push back what he created. The truth about him can bring an end to what he created, and it is a weapon within the reach of everyone. FOR MORE ABOUT IT'S ALL ABOUT MUHAMMAD, VISIT: http://itsallaboutmuhammad.com/

Obama Administration Dropped Huge Terror-Funding Case

Why did the Obama Administration drop a huge terror-funding case? In 2014, I was involved in triggering a federal investigation into Islamic Relief, one of the world’s largest Islamic charities. A criminal case was presented by three government agencies, whereupon the Obama Administration’s Justice Department astounded the agents involved by declining to prosecute. It is time for Congress to demand answers. A federal special agent with years of counter-terrorism experience noticed my published research into the Islamic Relief charity and asked to meet with me in 2014. As I walked him through a trove of documents, he was taken aback: Islamic Relief, a powerhouse global charity, had extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and other extremist groups, while receiving federal grants and federal employee donations. The charity was embraced by both political parties. It even enjoyed close working relationships with the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development. This raised questions about the government’s vetting process and the influence of Islamic Relief and similar groups on U.S. counter-terrorism policy. It became clear to the agent that an investigation of Islamic Relief would likely implicate a range of other powerful organizations. I provided information on eight additional groups that could be subject to a broader investigation. The agent was alarmed by the gravity of the situation. He, nor anyone he knew of, had been briefed about this multilayered Islamist network in America. As a result of my research and briefings, an investigation was triggered. The FBI, IRS and Office of Personnel Management opened investigations into Islamic Relief and its various arms. Islamic Relief USA’s acceptance onto the Combined Federal Campaign charity list, which allows federal employees to automatically donate to approved non-profits, also drew federal scrutiny. The case was potentially bigger than the one against the Holy Land Foundation, the largest terrorism-financing case in American history. And, if prosecutions occurred, there would likely be a domino effect impacting many other Islamist organizations in America and around the world. Then, near the end of Obama Administration in 2016, the Justice Department declined to prosecute. Federal agents were stunned. No clear reason was given. The investigation into Islamic Relief continued, but the criminal case presented by the three government agencies would not move forward. The only reasonable speculation: The administration lacked the political will to take on the case. Indeed, the blowback might have been massive at home and abroad. Islamic Relief Worldwide, headquartered in the U.K., has 16 branches including Islamic Relief USA and 26 field offices. It boasted a $156 million budget in 2016 and its U.S. arm listed $115 million in total revenue. It has the resources to fight back in the press, in the courts, and, to influence voters. Federal investigators would likely have been tarred as anti-Muslim bigots. Yet, the evidence implicating the charity has only gotten stronger over time. One of Islamic Relief’s senior officials admitted that his organization was founded by Muslim Brotherhood ideologues. Extensive ties to Islamist extremists remain, including ones linked to terrorism. The U.S. wing of Islamic Relief overlaps with organizations that the Justice Department has identified as affiliated not only with the Muslim Brotherhood but also Hamas, which is listed by the State Department as a foreign terrorist organization, and the Muslim Brotherhood. Islamic Relief has received tens of millions of taxpayer dollars from the West, including more than $700,000 from the U.S. government. The State Department even hailed Islamic Relief as a partner in a July 2017 announcement. The charity was advising the U.S. Agency for International Development and State Department at the very same time that Israel banned the group for funding Hamas. The Israeli government said Islamic Relief “funnels millions of dollars a year to Hamas institutions.” The United Arab Emirates has also banned the charity as a terrorist entity. Unfortunately, the handling of the Islamic Relief case is part of a larger pattern. Not a single U.S. charity has been blacklisted for having links to terrorism since the earliest days of the Obama Administration. National security reporter Patrick Poole broke two stories in 2011 about how the Justice Department had torpedoed prosecutions of multiple individuals and organizations linked to Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Muslim Brotherhood in America. The Clarion Project The very same Islamist organizations in question were actually advising the federal government. A senior adviser to the Department of Homeland Security was closely linked to them and helped craft jaw-dropping guidelines for law enforcement training that would preclude any instruction about the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamist network in America. Since then, a DHS whistleblower has come forward with his story about the purging of important intelligence records, including those related to this Islamist network. And we’ve learned about how the Obama administration let Hezbollah’s drug trafficking operation in America “off the hook” for the sake of the nuclear deal with Iran. In the early months of 2017, I approached the Middle East Forum, a Philadelphia-based non-profit, with my story and requested assistance in filing Freedom of Information Act requests. In January 2018, the Office of Personnel Management’s response confirmed that the investigation into Islamic Relief is ongoing. Since the Forum’s publicizing of the information about the investigation I shared, seven congressmen have written letters to the directors of the FBI, IRS and OPM about the Islamic Relief investigation. Because the charity receives taxpayer money, the congressmen said it is “critically important” that Congress be kept informed of evidence linking it to extremist or terror-related activity. Last year, then-Rep. Ron DeSantis wrote legislation to forbid the sending of taxpayer money to Islamic Relief Worldwide. He argued that, more broadly, taxpayer money shouldn’t go to any groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. These congressional inquiries are a good start. More members of Congress should demand answers. But they are not enough. Congress should investigate Islamic Relief on its own to uncover why it has received taxpayer money despite its well-documented history and to find out why the Justice Department dropped a criminal case that could have been one of the biggest terrorism-related prosecutions in our lifetime. This article appeared originally on Townhall.com.

add this